Why do farmers in Switzerland put large holes in the belly of cows?

Why do farmers in Switzerland put large holes in the belly of cows?

 

 

If you have already seen a hole in the stomach of a cow, you must have wondered what it is. Well, this hole is called a "rumen fistula", a hole connected to a tube that reaches the inside of the stomach, and it is there for a specific reason and not for the purpose of the sight only.
Rubber caps are used to close this opening and open it when needed. After the success of the breakthrough and placing the rubber band on the cow's crater, farmers and veterinarians can follow the digestion processes in their stomach and provide a good and useful diet.





All farmers know that the stomach cow contain microbes and fungi allow digest herbs and materials consumed, this hole helps the cows that can not afford food processing well, because of the destitution of this fungus and microbes, digestion naturally like other cows, where the cattle breeders of these factors transplant Equipment of cattle mentioned by entering into the stomach through this tube.
These holes also allow farmers to monitor and develop the digestion of cows, but PETA is not happy with the procedure because it is considered a violation of animal rights. According to a report on its official website, cows are not cars, It is not permissible to cut into its tucks what looks like gasoline pump openings on its sides.






The organization also denounced the huge number of photographs and videos praising what it called "abuse" of innocent animals.

Cows that are subjected to this type of practice have been called "codified" cows, which have become like vials with openings for either packing or unloading. These practices, which have been used for a long time, must stop, and farmers must stop extracting a large part of the stomach Cattle to keep access to their equipment available. The worst thing to say is that even some veterinary schools have introduced such practices, which must protect animals and provide them with treatment rather than torture.

Although al-Bayatra and many producers of milk products and meat claim that these operations do not cause harm to cows or reduce their potential life span, this "abuse" continues to affect cows as it results in a six-month recovery period for full recovery This is the period in which the cow suffers without doubt.

Although many claim that this process would improve the health of cattle, which is of great interest, FAO believes that the only beneficiaries of these operations are dairy and meat producers who may provide anything immoral for animal exploitation And to benefit from their suffering.

In addition to the fact that these poor cows are "exposed", they are presented in various events, such as agricultural and agricultural exhibitions in which farmers and agricultural employers are invited to experiment with their hands in open cows as a form of promotion of these operations by the birds. These cows do not extend the federal Animal Protection Act; they are the only law that protects animals during experiments; to animal experiments in the framework of the development of agriculture, meaning that they have no legal protection from this "horror".

The same organization also appealed to all those who condemned these operations to act to establish laws protecting these cows by preventing them from carrying out such operations.

But at the same time, this innovation is good for some types of cows that can not survive without it, and the presence of this thing is also healthy for the lives of some cows, and believes that these holes prolong the overall life of cows, as it helps them to gain weight and ensure care Her good health.

Finally, dear reader, you have the freedom to judge these processes as ethical or immoral, useful or harmful.
The References
- Goodfullness location
- site peta

Share this

Related Posts

Previous
Next Post »